If you are responsible for a country or destination brand, read on.
As cheap air travel and the package tour (as well as the devaluation of the Spanish Peseta and the abolition of currency controls in the UK) helped jump start international travel in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s, the world was still a fairly predictable place and countries were, on the whole inhabited mainly by citizens of that country and not by the multicultural citizens living in most cities today.
Moreover, due to the social and economic structure of Western countries, consumers were only just beginning to have disposable income that allowed them to experience the concept of leisure time.
At the same time, mass media was becoming increasingly influential as consumers purchased more and more TVs and radios.
So, with more disposable income, more leisure time and the establishment of commercial television, it was now possible to reach large swathes of a population reasonably quickly and relatively inexpensively.
In this environment countries put their faith in creativity to build brands, hoping that an exotic image, tagline or promotion would resonate with prospects and increase visitor arrivals.
And generally, because of the cultural and social predictability of countries, the same message could be used to communicate with everyone.
Moreover, with few conduits to increasingly wealthy consumers who had more disposable income than ever before and with limited competition in the market place, this type of creative driven branding often raised the profile of countries enough to attract visitors.
Countries and destinations such as Spain, the UK, Kenya, Florida, Greece, The Algarve, Singapore and Italy as well as many other destinations used this approach. And in this mass market economy, mass media – TV, Print, Outdoor, with its huge reach, was the logical vehicle to enhance the impact of creative-driven branding with reach and repetition.
But that mass-market economy no longer exists. Today’s consumers are increasingly overwhelmed with those creative images, taglines and promotions. And many of the messages have become so similar that it is virtually impossible to differentiate one from another. And of course, consumers have also become fed up with countries failing to deliver on promises made.
Despite this new world order, countries, agencies and consultants continue to try and build country brands by using ‘cool’ advertising, creative or symbolic logo’s with pretty colours, catchy taglines and so on.
But these activities are nothing more than advertising campaigns and do very little to build a nation brand. And even the one’s that have made us sit up, take notice and seek more information are more often than not soon forgotten or overtaken by a new campaign from a competitor destination or the recommendation of a friend.
But most worrying of all, these advertising campaigns lull countries into a false sense of security. ‘Visitor arrivals are up so everything is good in the world’. The problem is that an advertising campaign might draw the attention of visitors to a destination but it doesn’t build a destination brand.
An advertising campaign may be important but it is part of what should be a well researched and planned brand strategy that takes into account all brand related activities.
These include internal buy in and a thorough understanding of external stakeholder requirements for value and other elements such as content development, social media, PR and most important of all for a country, crisis management. Traditional communications pushed out across traditional and digital media, may still have a role to play, but they are not a total solution.
Sadly, too many countries and destinations have short cut the process to try and get their ads out quickly. This has resulted in the demise of the brand strategy. Yet failure to invest in such a brand strategy can be detrimental to the long term success of the brand.
A case in point. The Maldives has invested more than US$10 million in the last three years on advertising itself as a luxury destination. But in 2012, political turmoil saw arrivals from the lucrative European markets fall, with the UK registering a 12.2% drop. If it weren’t for a sharp rise in low yield arrivals from China, the Maldives would probably have registered a major drop in arrivals.
To the detriment of the country, participants or perhaps victims of the political turmoil in the Maldives called for a boycott of the tourism business and attempts by the new government to develop the tourism business are constantly thwarted by opponents.
One example was when the Twitter hashtag #sunnysideoflife (the official tagline) was hijacked and brochures entitled ‘The cloudy side of life’ threw scorn on tourism players and drew the readers attention to human rights abuses and police brutality against Maldivians.
This year has seen further negative press after a 15 year old girl raped by her stepfather and sexually abused by other men was sentenced to 100 lashes for having pre marital sex.
So far the Maldives government hasn’t responded, leading one to suspect they don’t have a brand strategy with a crisis plan to deal with such a situation. What is certainly true is that this complicated issue will not be solved with an advertising campaign.
In 2012 Jakarta initiated an advertising campaign across Asia in an attempt to attract visitors to the capital and largest city in Indonesia. The campaign was poorly planned, conceived and executed. You can read more about the Jakarta campaign here.
Based on the advertising campaign and the website, it is fairly safe to assume these two elements were not part of a brand strategy.
India is famous for its ‘Incredible India’ campaign launched in 2002. By 2009, India was spending US$200 million advertising the country. This iconic advertising campaign is still going strong and in November 2012 at the World Travel Market in London and to great fanfare, India announced a new advertising campaign headlined, “Find what you seek”.
Officially launched by the new Indian minister of tourism at a hotel in London in front of 400 guests, the new Incredible India campaign highlighted to consumers ‘that they will find whatever they are looking for from a holiday in India.’
It was also announced at the launch event that the goal of the campaign is to increase international arrivals by 12% annual till 2016.
Little more than a month later, in December 2012 in Delhi a woman was brutally gang raped and left for dead on a public bus. The story made headlines around the world.
And then in March 2013, a Swiss woman was gang raped whilst on a cycling tour of Madhya Pradesh and soon after, a British woman was attacked in Delhi and only avoided further suffering after jumping from a hotel window to escape.
Within a matter of weeks, tour operators were reporting a 35% cancellation rate from women and a 25% drop in all arrivals with multiple cancellations from the lucrative markets of Australia, the UK, Canada and the United States.
Much of the outrage toward these events is related to the treatment of woman in India and numerous stories that would not normally feature on international news are now making headlines globally including the stoning, arrests and murder of Indian women. None of these events will be addressed by advertising.
If you are responsible for developing a Nation, country or destination brand, don’t allow yourself to be lulled into a false sense of security over a ‘successful’ advertising and promotions campaign telling the world how great is your country or destination.
To build a strong brand amid increasing international competition and unforeseen circumstances that are carried across social media and possibly across mass media as well, destinations must have in place a well defined brand strategy that covers all potential scenarios and doesn’t just focus on communications.
A brand strategy has other benefits. Here are five more reasons for developing a brand strategy:
1) A brand strategy clearly defines the organisation values and promises and ensures stakeholders understand what is required of them to deliver on those promises and values. For a nation brand this internal branding is critical to the success of the brand.
2) Staying with the internal brand, lots of tourism boards and CVBs attend trade shows but if I had a pound for every time I’ve been to ITB or WTM and seen poorly trained personnel representing countries or states, I’d be a very wealthy man. Trade shows cost a lot of money. A brand strategy will ensure training occurs at the best possible time.
3) A brand strategy ensures the brand is ready for every eventuality, with a crisis plan to address issues such as those that have happened in India, the Maldives and most recently, Boston.
4) A brand strategy ensures all stakeholders are pulling in the same direction. If one state is targeting visitors at the same time as another state, resources are being wasted. A brand strategy will ensure integration and engagement, not individual tactics.
5) A brand strategy ensures time isn’t wasted on stand alone tactical initiatives implemented at the whim of a government servant or other person who should know better.
Far too many countries or destinations give the responsibility of building their brand to creative advertising agencies. These agencies are called advertising agencies for a reason. They do advertising.
14 thoughts on “Building a country brand requires more than just a well executed advertising campaign”
This segment from the first sentence of your article does not make you look very smart: “…helped jump start international travel in the 1960’s, 1970’s and 1980’s, the world was still a fairly predictable place…”
To create the plural of the numeric decades 1960, 1970, and 1980, simply add an s after the number. Like this: 1960s, 1970s, 1980s.
To create the plural of abbreviated decades, an apostrophe is used to indicate where characters have been omitted: ’60s, ’70s, ’80s.
To create the possessive of a decade, an apostrophe and an s are used. As in, “1970’s music…”
Key takeaway: To look smart, it helps if you write smart.
Hi Chi Min
I must have been engulfed by a wave of thickness when I wrote that line and I thank you for pointing out the mistake and for offering your advice.
BTW, did the content have any relevance to you or did you find it interesting or were you too disgusted to carry on?
Thanks for the interesting perspective on branding vs advertising. It’s relevant to our coverage of asia coastal tourism development. I’ve re-posted your article at thedevelopmentadvisor.com with credits and link back. If you’d like to guest post at some point in future please contact us.
Thanks for dropping by, your comments and for re-posting the article.
I’m not so much trying to pit advertising against branding, more that destinations must look to brand building to build their brands and not rely on expensive creative campaigns that may work in the short term but do little to address contentious issues.
I’ll be in touch as I’d like to learn more about what you do.
Andrew, it has been a while! How do I get in touch with you?
Marcus, an excellent post I couldn’t agree more. While advertising can be effective in conveying part of the brand message, it should only be part of the picture. In the Digital Age destinations must master a more holistic approach to branding. Marketing must be integrated across traditional and digital platforms, but importantly the brand must be anchored in the reality that visitors will experience. Just because a destination says something in its advertising doesn’t make it so, customers will more than balance that if it’s not true – and today they have the social media tools! Experience delivery, training and partner outreach are fundamental to a successful brand. Too often supposed “brand strategies” for nations are simply a new advertising campaign theme. As you point out, there’s much more to a sustainable brand than advertising and the engagement of advertising creative. There is a role for the ad creative, but only in targeted application.
Thanks for your comment Bill.
I agree with everything you say. Nothing more to add. Cheers
I find your article very interesting except for the part that you don’t seems to be confident in role of advertising agencies in making a brand a success. Branding Building is a process of many tactical strategies including advertising and continuous adverting in either way…as advertising is an integral part of any brand’s life…no brand can live longer if not advertise…you may recall many brands stopped their advertising for while and missed their ranking as top choice brand…they had to advertise later to reclaim their positions. Nutshell Advertising in an integral part of Branding
Sardarzaheer, there was a time when advertising was fundamental to any brand building program for a nation. I spent more than a decade of my career doing just that. My comments above (9th Feb) highlight how it now takes a much more integrated approach these days and the role of traditional advertising is reducing. With the emergence of social media and instant global communications, paying attention to the actual experience, and not just hollow promises is changing the tourism landscape.
Thank you for this amazing article, I found very enlightening. So tell us, what elements are not to be left out when building a brand strategy?